UNESCO's World Heritage opted against including the world's largest living structure of organisms from its 'in danger' list earlier this month.
The draft decision argued that Australia had taken several significant steps to preserving the reef under its Reef 2050 plan.
Does this decision mean that danger to the reef is over, like the decision would suggest? Alas, no.
In the decision, UNESCO also criticised Australia for failing to reach water targets. Last month, in what increasingly seems like doublethink, the same body even warned that World Heritage coral reefs are likely to disappear by 2100.
While Australia celebrates a big political win by protecting their tourism industry and avoiding political embarrassment, puzzled scientists fret over the famous 1,400-mile stretch of reef's future.
Unprecedented coral bleaching - where stresses such as climate change prompt coral to expel algae, dooming it to starvation - damaged two-thirds of the reef this year, aerial surveys have shown.
An 'in danger' status would be to help tackle threats by raising international awareness and sparking conservation efforts for a reef that to even an untrained eye, appears very much still in danger.