A successful campaign launched by 15-year-old Rayouf Alhumedhi even led to the addition of a hijab emoji, a fact which seems to prove what we already know: representation matters.
Recently, the trans community has voiced similar desires for a trans flag emoji.
Especially as media-led transphobia continues to dominate discussions, the addition of the flag would indicate a form of recognition as well as a form of acceptance.
But what did Unicode introduce instead? A lobster emoji.
In response, activist Charlie Craggs – whose Nail Transphobia! Initiative sees her travel the country and foster communication over free manicures – has launched a campaign calling for the flag to be added.
Photo: Charlie Craggs, courtesy of Nail It!
In a statement, she writes:
Emojis are a way for the world to connect, and trans people shouldn’t be left out of the conversation.
Unicode granted the Lobster emoji proposal, which argued that people suffered ‘frustration and confusion’ at having to use a shrimp or crab emoji instead of a lobster. Imagine if that was your gender.
Surely we deserve the same rights you have afforded crustaceans?
Ironically, further research soon revealed that lobsters can actually be gyandromorphs – meaning that they can contain both male and female characteristics.
These deviations from ‘male’ and ‘female’ sex are pretty common amongst animals; clownfish can change their sex if the shift is ‘triggered’ (a fun fact that never made it into Finding Nemo!) whereas barnacles, slugs and worms can also have both male and female reproductive organs.