Ann Widdecombe sparks outrage over ‘repulsive’ remarks about Strictly’s same-gender couple

A former lawmaker known for anti-LGBTQ voting record is under fire once again, unsurprisingly, for saying people don’t want to watch a same-gender couple dance on television.

BBC’s Strictly Come Dancing series 18 debut earlier this week featured the programme’s first ever same-gender couple, with Olympic champion boxer Nicola Adams paired with dancer Katya Jones.

In an interview with the Sunday Times, the former Brexit Party MEP Ann Widdecombe – who herself was a contestant on the show in 2010 – said:

I don’t think it is what viewers of Strictly, especially families, are looking for. But that’s up to the audience and the programme.

This was met with a flurry of backlash, with people called the comments "harmful", "repulsive" and old-fashioned.

“If you’ve got a problem with Nicola Adams dancing with a woman on Strictly then it’s just that - *you’ve* got a problem and that problem is called homophobia,” one Twitter user wrote.

“ Ann Widdecombe!! ‘Families’ do want to so don’t you dare try & generalise your disgraceful homophobic views onto the rest of us. Our family can’t wait see watch @bbcstrictly this year. Our kids were so excited to see @NicolaAdamsOBE & @Mrs_katjones paired,” another said.

This is certainly not the first time Widdecombe has been accused of homophobia, making people wonder why she had been given a platform in the first place.

“We shouldn’t expect any less from this proven homophobe. And the likes of Strictly and Channel 4 are partly to blame for legitimising her views by giving her platforms as some ‘national treasure’,” Declan Cashin tweeted.

“It's weird because i have literally never looked for ann widdecombe's opinion about anything and yet here she is,” Mollie Goodfellow added.

Clearly the country is not in agreement with the right-wing politician, as Saturday's episode marked the show’s highest ratings in three years after nine million viewers tuned in to watch the couple.

Thank goodness for that.

Please log in or register to upvote this article
The Conversation (0)