However, the unsavoury truth is that the gossip mag had merely had a “conversation” with an AI programme that had been trained to mimic him.
In other words, it was entirely fake.
The article, which carried the headline ‘My life has completely changed’ and was structured as a Q&A, discussed “Schumacher’s” feelings about the 2013 accident and his future, The Timesreports.
\u201cL'interview de la honte chez Die Aktuelle.\n\nPublier une "interview exclusive" de Michael Schumacher g\u00e9n\u00e9r\u00e9e par une intelligence artificielle ... Quel manque de d\u00e9cence.\u201d
It begins, according to The Mirror by hailing the quality of its “incredible interview”, saying: "No meagre, nebulous half-sentences from friends. But answers from him! By Michael Schumacher, 54 [...] With redeeming answers to the most burning questions that the whole world has been asking for so long."
It then goes on to set out “comments” from the man himself, including: “My life has completely changed since [the accident]. That was a horrible time for my wife, my children and the whole family,”
“I was so badly injured that I lay for months in a kind of artificial coma, because otherwise my body couldn’t have dealt with it all. I’ve had a tough time but the hospital team has managed to bring me back to my family.”
The source of the “discussion” appears to have been Character.ai, a free chatbot website, which simulates answers from a range of famous figures.
And despite the uproar the piece has provoked, Die Aktuelle may well get away with the tasteless deception.
Lower down on the same front page that touts the “world sensation” interview, the magazine hints that all’s not as it seems, including the sub-headlines: “It sounds deceptively real", “What’s behind it?” and “Die Actuelle searches for clues.”
Then, in the text itself, further questions are posed as to the source’s credibility.
It reportedly posits: “There are in fact websites where you can have conversations with celebrities, but the answers are provided by artificial intelligence. But how does the AI know their personal backgrounds? Their marriages, their children, their illnesses?
“As with Wikipedia, someone must have put the information on the internet. Was it really Schumi himself who typed out this information from his sickbed? Or perhaps someone from his family, a carer or an employee? At any rate, the answers sound deceptively real. Too good to be true?”
As readers and social media users were quick to point out, there was nothing “good” about this stunt.
Have your say in our news democracy. Click the upvote icon at the top of the page to help raise this article through the indy100 rankings.