Kate Plummer
Oct 13, 2022
indy
A Financial Times journalist has been widely praised after she said what we were all thinking about Jacob Rees-Mogg.
Gillian Tett, who was a key commenter during the 2008 financial crash, bluntly explained why the business secretary's suggestion that the Bank of England's interest rate policy is to blame for economic woe instead of the government is utter nonsense.
“To use a non-technical term, that is pretty much bollocks," she said, when asked about the issue on Channel 4.
“I think for the most part it really was the budget and the way it was delivered and the message inside, which sparked the beginning of the crisis," she added.
“The Bank of England certainly is to blame for not having prepared for these kinds of dislocations. The British pension funds appear to have been somewhat asleep at the wheel in terms of their risk management systems.
Sign up to our free Indy100 weekly newsletter
“But at the end of day, the spark that lit this fire was very much the budget announcement.”
Interviewer Krishnan Guru-Murthy apologised for her language and said he was unsure if it was allowed. He then added he checked on media regulator Ofcom's website and found that it was described as "medium language".
People thought it was "incredible":
\u201cIncredible scenes on channel 4. Worth staying for the last five seconds of this\u201d— Alan White (@Alan White) 1665603597
\u201cOn Mogg \u201cwell that\u2019s pretty much bollocks\u201d. Stick this int Louvre.\u201d— Gav \u3013\u3013 (@Gav \u3013\u3013) 1665638306
\u201c...and the award for Best Use of a British Rail Technical Term goes to...\u201d— The Man in Seat 61 (@The Man in Seat 61) 1665643241
Savage.
Have your say in our news democracy. Click the upvote icon at the top of the page to help raise this article through the indy100 rankings.
Top 100
The Conversation (0)