News
Kate Plummer
Aug 09, 2021
Boris Johnson – a man who once claimed looking into historic child abuse investigations was “spaffing money up the wall” – has just spent almost £100,000 on paintings for his own wall.
The Prime Minister has infuriated the nation by spending the sum on two paintings to hang in Downing Street, despite the Government facing tough decisions on spending cuts and tax hikes.
Accounts from the taxpayer-bolstered Government Art Collection show that £70,200 was spent on a painting by Belfast-born artist Cathy Wilkes, 54. The untitled work is egg tempera on linen.
A second piece, costing £18,775 from photographer, video and installation artist Willie Doherty is a set of four black-and-white photographs called Ashen, Restless, which show vegetation and their shadows on a grey concrete background.
Downing Street was unable to say how much public cash was spent on the art but insisted the “majority” came from donors, according to The Mirror. So that’s fine, then...
Apparently not. Reacting to the story, people were outraged.
Labour MP Neil Coyle told The Mirror: “His selfishness and desire for luxuries for himself whilst cutting support and income for others is a sign of the sickness at the heart of his Government.”
Labour backbencher Emma Lewell-Buck added: “The selfishness of this Prime Minister is galling. When shelves are bare in my local food banks, businesses have gone to the wall, public sector and key workers have suffered pay freezes and cuts, his priority is once again himself.”
Meanwhile, other people took to social media to slam the PM:
Nearly £100,000 spent on Downing St paintings as Boris Johnson planned to slash benefits Welcome to Johnsons “gold… https://t.co/gPu9KWC3kU— Peter Stefanovic (@Peter Stefanovic) 1628488419
@PoliticsForAlI @DailyMirror Why? Why are we wasting money inside 10 Downing Street?! Use that money to feed poor people. #ToriesOut— Ryan Colaço (Ryan C™) #Arsenal #BlackLivesMatter (@Ryan Colaço (Ryan C™) #Arsenal #BlackLivesMatter) 1628458101
@PoliticsForAlI @DailyMirror Wow. Can't feed hungry kids or fund the NHS tho.— Scrub Daddy Pumper (@Scrub Daddy Pumper) 1628458449
This PM is an absolute philistine, chances are the paintings are execrable, daubed by a chum who doesn’t know his a… https://t.co/Lj7AtA1vU4— Kathleen Edwards (@Kathleen Edwards) 1628497977
Nearly £100,000 was spent on two paintings to adorn the walls of 10 Downing Street as Boris Johnson drew up plans t… https://t.co/0BcG1TyJUC— christhebarker (@christhebarker) 1628492760
No 10 has spent £100,000 on 2 pictures. Meanwhile, Sunak plans to remove the £20 UC uplift. Tells you everything about Tory priorities.— BF Ferguson #FBPE #FBPA #FBPPR #3.5% (@BF Ferguson #FBPE #FBPA #FBPPR #3.5%) 1628492720
And others were not massive fans of the paintings:
@PoliticsForAlI @DailyMirror WTAF! https://t.co/iaD9XyrZSd— David price (@David price) 1628458665
@christhebarker Are those the paintings? 😳— Zoe Montgomery (@Zoe Montgomery) 1628493539
But some managed to muster a sense of humour about the debacle:
can't believe the government spent nearly £100,000 on these two paintings https://t.co/GyujQMstm5— Gpoptosis (@Gpoptosis) 1628489742
It is not the first time Johnson has been accused of being a bit spendthrift. We all, of course, remember wallpaper-gate, in which he p*ssed people off by spending quite a bit on his Downing Street flat refurbishment.
In this case, a Government spokesman told The Mirror: “The Government Art Collection helps to promote the creativity of British art and culture by showcasing its works in the UK and across the globe.
“It acquires new works after consulting and securing the approval of an independent expert panel, and the majority of funding for acquisitions comes from philanthropic sources – not taxpayers’ money.”
It is understood the two works were purchased to mark the centenary of the foundation of Northern Ireland.
Former culture secretary Ed Vaizey, now a Tory peer, also supported the purchases, saying: “Govt art collection has supported British artists for 120 years – a unique cultural asset for our country.”
He added: “(Boris Johnson) would have had no involvement in acquisition, which wld have come from existing budget.”
This episode of Grand Designs is *not* our favourite.
Top 100
The Conversation (0)