Court overturns Novak Djokovic visa decision - here’s how people are reacting

Court overturns Novak Djokovic visa decision - here’s how people are reacting

A judge has overturned the Australian government’s decision to deny Novak Djokovic entry into the country - but his visa could still be cancelled by the country’s immigration minister.

The tennis world number one flew into Melbourne last week to compete and defend his title in the upcoming Australia Open and was granted a medical exemption for entry into the country by Tennis Australia and Victoria state.

However Australia’s border control officers who held Djokovic at Melbourne airport for several hours before they decided to cancel his visa.

In a statement at the time, Prime Minister Scott Morrison declared that “rules are rules” and said he had been advised that “such an exemption was not in place”

But Judge Anthony Kelly was not satisfied that the tennis star was given enough time to make comments on his visa cancellation. Under section 116 of the Australian Migration Act, Djokovic was supposed to have until 08:30 local time last Thursday to make comments - though it was 07:40 when a final decision was made by Border Force.

Sign up to our free Indy100 weekly newsletter

Referencing the prime minister’s original statement, Judge Kelly said: “We all play by the same rules,” although added: “Stated in other terms: those rules were not observed.”

In court documents, it was also revealed that Djokovic is not vaccinated against COVID-19 and told border officials that he tested positive for the virus back in June 2020 and most recently on 16 December which the 34-year-old’s lawyers argue makes him eligible for an exemption to Australia’s vaccination rules.

Despite the judge’s ruling in Djokovic’s appeal, there is still a possibility he could be booted from Australia if the immigration minister Alex Hawke decides to cancel the tennis player’s visa on different grounds.

These new grounds are if Hawke feels that Djokovic that “may be, or would or might be, a risk to: (i) the health, safety or good order of the Australian community or a segment of the Australian community,” The Daily Mail reported.

This could mean another court hearing and if Hawke does decide to exercise this power then Djokovic could be looking at a three-year ban from entering Australia.

Djokovic himself has since broken his silence and in a tweet to his 8.9m followers shared how he is “pleased and grateful” at the judge’s decision to overturn his visa cancellation.

“Despite all that has happened, I want to stay and try to compete @AustralianOpen I remain focused on that. I flew here to play at one of the most important events we have in front of the amazing fans,” he wrote.

In a follow-up tweet, Djokovic added: “For now I cannot say more but THANK YOU all for standing with me through all this and encouraging me to stay strong.”

Meanwhile, supporters of the tennis star in Australia have been celebrating the decision.

People on Twitter have also been reacting to the latest developments.

For once, Nigel Farage is not a fan of Australian-style immigration rules - who saw that coming?

Mehdi Ali, an Iranian refugee who has been detained by Australian officials for nine years ever since he travelled from Iran to Australia by boat at the age of 15, is hopeful that Djokovic will use his profile and recent experience staying in a detention hotel to speak up for other detainees.

While an Australian nurse in reaction to the news on Djokovic, as they highlighted the realities of treating Covid patients in hospital as cases in the country have risen recently.

Here’s how other people reacted:

We’ll have to wait and see if this ruling will allow Djokovic to compete and potentially win a record 21st grand slam title and the Australian Open for a 10th time or if Australia’s immigration minister has other ideas.

The Conversation (0)